GULAM QADIR v. UT OF J AND K TH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAMBA AND ANOTHER
WP(C)/34/2025 · 2025-01-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1568 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1568 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP (C) No. 34/2025 CM No. 61/2025
Ghulam Qadir ….Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Ms. Vasudha Sharma, Advocate.
V/s
U.T of J&K and another ….Respondent(s)
Through :-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 03.01.2025 After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law as the instant petition is not maintainable. Her statement is taken on record. In view of the above, the instant petition is ‘dismissed as withdrawn’ with liberty as prayed for.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
Jammu: 03.01.2025 Renu
Sr.No. 26 Renu Bala 2025.01.03 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document