Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15678 (KAR)

SRI B UMESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11510/2021 · 2025-02-06

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5465 WP No. 11510 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 11510 OF 2021 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: SRI B UMESH, S/O B BASANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT GORLAKATTEE VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, KARANTAKA, PIN-577517. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ANANDA, ADVOCATE - (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDAKR ROAD, BANGALURU-560001, REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALURU-560001, REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM),O AND M CIRCLE, HIREYUR, CHITRADURGA DISRICT-577 517. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), O AND M RURAL DIVISION, HIREYUR, BESCOM, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 517. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M RAJKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2, SRI H V DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4) Digitally signed by BELUR RANGADHAMA NANDINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5465 WP No. 11510 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM PASSED BY THE R4 VIDE ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER 1. Today this case is listed for 'Dismissal', noticing the fact on 30.01.2025 that office objections were not complied since 2021, and there was no representation for the petitioner even when the case was called for the second time. 2. Today also, there is no representation. The case is listed under the caption 'dismissal'. Since there is no representation and more than four years have elapsed since the date of filing, there is no ground to adjourn the matter. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE BRN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33