TAJ ALI @ TAAJ VARSI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
NABAIL/1004/2025 · 2025-08-08
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156770 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156770 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46406 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1004 of 2025 Applicant :- Taj Ali @ Taaj Varsi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Sharma , the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as Ms. Shikha Sinha , the learned A.G.A.-I appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.99 of 2025 under Sections 316(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Jarwal Road, District-Bahraich. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 25.05.2025 against the applicant, his brother and two unknown persons stating that the accused persons had taken Rs.1.20 Lakhs for getting the informant and his brother employed in abroad. The informant met the accused persons in a fair in the night of 25.03.2025 and demanded return of his money whereupon the accused persons had threatened him. While the informant was returning home, the accused persons hit him by their SUV causing injuries to the informant and his friend. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail application it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 20 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely been implicated in the present case. 5. The injury reports of the informant and the other injured person has been annexed with the bail application and both of them had suffered simple injuries. 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and she has submitted that the investigation of the present case is still pending. 7.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
the case and keeping in view the fact that even as per the FIR version, the injuries have been suffered in a motorcycle on which the informant was riding was hit by a vehicle on road and there is some old dispute between the parties; the injuries caused in the incident are simple in nature and that the applicant is a young man aged 20 years having no criminal history, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicants is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant- Taj Ali @ Taaj Varsi before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court : (i) that the applicant shall make himself/herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 8.8.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench