RABENDRA SINGH @ RAVI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/999/2025 · 2025-08-07
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156762 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156762 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46132 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 999 of 2025 Applicant :- Rabendra Singh @ Ravi Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhanupriya Singh,Mohd. Ateeq Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Smt. Bhanupriya Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Nagarjun Pandey, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Shishir Pradhan, the
learned counsel for the complainant.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.21 of 2025, under Sections 406 B.N.S.2023, registered at Police Station Shivgarh, District Raebareli.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 19.02.2025 against the applicant and one Rahul Vaish stating that while the informant was lodged in jail his partner Ravi Singh (the applicant) visited him inside the jail along with trader Rahul Vaish and persuaded the applicant to sell paddy worth Rs.70,00,000/- to the co-accused Rahul Vaish. However, the informant's share of sale consideration has not been paid to him.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail- application it has been contended that the applicant is innocent, he has no criminal history and he has falsely been implicated in the present case.
5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on
31.03.2025.
6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the only allegation against the applicant is regarding non-payment of share of sale
consideration of the informant in a sale transaction made by the partner with his consent which prima facie appears to be a dispute which is essentially of civil nature coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal history and without making any observations which may affect the outcome of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.
7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Rabendra Singh @ Ravi Singh before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court'
(iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench