ARPIT SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/7281/2025 · 2025-08-19
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156755 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156755 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7281 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arpit Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vipul Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following main relief:
"To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties not harass the petitioner on the false pretext that there is some dispute with some people and to protect the fundamental rights of the petitioner from the unnecessary harassment made by the opposite party No. 3."
3. Learned A.G.A. has produced the copy of letter dated 07.08.2025 provided by one Shivanand Sub Inspector, Police Station- Bajarkhala Commissionerate Lucknow indicating therein that against the petitioner, three persons namely Ankit Giri son of Madhav Rajgiri, Subhash Verma son of Vidyadhar Verma and Govind Bhushan Madhukar son of Late Subedar have lodged a complaint stating that the petitioner is running one firm in the name of Aavam Trading dealing in stock market wherein those complainants have invested some amount. The petitioner has not returned the said amount to them. On the basis of aforesaid complaint all three persons, the police is making inquiry in the matter. The aforesaid letter is taken on record.
4. Learned A.G.A. has informed that the police personnel to whom the issue has been handed over are not harassing the petitioner, rather they are acting upon the complaint. Learned A.G.A. has also submitted that no FIR has been lodged in the matter till date.
5. Be that as it may, if no FIR has been lodged against the petitioner, the police personnel may not visit at the place of the petitioner regularly, if they are so visiting and for redressal of
the grievance of the complainants, any single date may be fixed calling upon the above named complainants and the petitioner and any appropriate exercise may be undertaken which is permissible under the law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitioner stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.8.2025 (Manoj K.) (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench