SHIVANI YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/7209/2025 · 2025-08-18
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156731 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156731 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48487-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7209 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shivani Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Masood Raza,Saniya Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State-Respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices to respondents No. 4 & 5 are hereby dispensed with. 3. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to interfere in the peaceful marital life of the petitioners and to provide protection to them. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are major and have married each other on their own volition on 10.02.2025 in Arya Samaj, Safedabad, Barabanki. The marriage certificate issued by the Arya Samaj, Safedabad, Barabanki has been enclosed as Annexure No. 4 to this petition. A copy of Certificate-cum-Marksheet of High School Examination of the petitioner No. 1 has been enclosed as Annexure No. 1 with this petition to substantiate that petitioner No. 1 is major as her date of birth is 01.01.2006. A copy of the Certificate of High School Examination of the petitioner No. 2 has also been enclosed as Annexure No. 1, according to which his date of birth is 16.08.1995. It is contended that the family members of petitioner No. 1 particularly respondents No. 4 & 5 are not happy with the marriage of the petitioners and as such they are creating hindrance in the peaceful married life of the petitioners and harassing them. Learned counsel has further stated that no First Information Report has been registered against the petitioners in this regard. 5. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instruction letter dated 06.08.2025, which is taken on record, states that no FIR has
been lodged against the petitioners. 6. In Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another, 2006 (5) SCC 475, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para-17 has observed as under:-
"17. .... This is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes.
If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is that they can cut-off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter- caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law."
7. The petitioners have also pleaded for protection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which guarantees liberty to lead life of their own with dignity. 8. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners in any manner. 9. It is made clear that if any FIR is already registered on the issue, the order passed by this Court shall automatically stand discharged. 10. The petitioners shall get their marriage registered under the
"Uttar Pradesh Marriages Registration Rules, 2017" within two months from today, failing which this order will automatically come to an end. 11. The Registrar of Marriages concerned is directed to process and issue the registration certificate to the petitioners as per law at the earliest. 12. However, it is made clear that this Court has not entered into nor adjudicated the age of the petitioners nor the veracity / validity of the alleged marriage.
Order Date :- 18.8.2025 (Manoj K.. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench