SURINDER PARKASH THAKUR v. SIDDHARTHA ACHARYA AND OTHERS
COPC/540/2025 · 2025-09-03
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15673 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15673 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
HIMACHAL P
RADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.540 of 2025
Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 __________________________________________________________________________ Surinder Parkash Thakur
……...Petitioner Versus Sh. Siddhartha Acharya and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. S. Partha Swamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate. _________________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 01.09.2025, enclosing therewith copy of joining report dated 01.09.2025, learned counsel representing the respondents states that petitioner has been reengaged and pursuant to re-engagement, he has also submitted his joining on 01.09.2025. Having perused aforesaid document, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and accordingly the same is disposed of. Notices are discharged. However, it is clarified that disposal of the petition at hand shall have no bearing on the rights of the petitioner, which is yet to be decided by this Court in main petition i.e. CWP No.7704 of 2021. September 03, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi)
Judge