- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7147 WP No. 22059 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 22059 OF 2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: DR. SNEHA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, D/O. MR. DHARAM PRAKASH GUPTA, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NO.54/1A, SURAH EAST ROAD, BELIAGHATA, KOLKATA-700 010. CURRENTLY RESIDING AT: SRI. BALAJI PG, NO.10, 20TH MAIN, BTM 1ST STAGE, MARUTHI NAGAR-MADIWALA, BANGALORE-560 068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIVEKANAND., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHUJATH AHMAD., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE DENTAL COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, NO.23, APPAJAPPA AGRAHARA, 1ST MAIN ROAD, CHAMRAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. 2. MRS. SONAM MAHAJAN AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, W/O MR.SAURABA GUSAIN, NO.212, NANDANA GREENS APARTMENTS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7147 WP No. 22059 of 2018 SOMESHWARA LAYOUT, BILEKAHALLI, BANGLAORE-560 076. 3. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, TO THE GOVERNMENT MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R.SHAILENDRA., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R3; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Vivekanand., counsel on behalf of Sri.Shujath Ahmed., for the petitioner and Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.3 have appeared in person. 2. The order dated:07.05.2018 passed by the third respondent vide Annexure-A is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7147 WP No. 22059 of 2018 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ paper with utmost care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the complainant has withdrawn the complaint, hence, nothing survives for consideration in the present Writ Petition. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. Because of withdrawal of the complaint, the order dated:07.05.2018 passed by the third respondent vide Annexure-A is quashed. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7.1