Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15667 (HP)

ANJNA KUMARI v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7013/2024 · 2025-05-22

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7013 of 2024 Date of Decision: 22.5.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Anjna Kumari ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur and Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Instructions placed on record at the behest of the Director (Elementary Education) Himachal Pradesh, clearly reveals that prayer made by the petitioner for transfer under 5% Inter-District Quota from District Chamba to District Mandi, cannot be considered on account of exhaustion of 5% Inter District Quota. 2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General states that now since new academic session has started, petitioner may file fresh representation, thereby making request to transfer her from District Chamba to Distict Mandi, under 5% Inter District Quota, which shall be considered strictly in accordance with the policy. - 2 - 3. Faced with foresaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh representation, praying therein for transfer of the petitioner from District Chamba to District Mandi under 5% Inter District Quota, within one week, which in turn shall be decided by the competent authority, within three weeks thereafter. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon taking note of transfer policy. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if she still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. May 22, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge