Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BA1 No. 1237 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J.
Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. The applicant – Arshad @ Dulla, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/ FIR No. 182 of 2025, under Sections 109 and 324 of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 r/ w 25 Arms Act, 1959, registered at P.S.- Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
5. In this case, an FIR was lodged on 15.05.2025 by the complainant, whereby it was alleged that when the complainant was going from his house at Ransura to Roorkee in his Wagon-R car bearing registration no. UK 08 BB 3155, in the midway, the applicant carrying a gun in his hand, shot at the complainant. The complainant was fortunate that the bullet missed him by a whisker. Thereafter, the applicant broke the window of the car with the butt of his gun, with the intention to kill the complainant.
6.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case, as the complainant did not sustain a single injury, not even cut or bruises; that perusal of the
arrest memo would reveal that a country- made pistol (katta) was recovered from him, wherein, in the FIR, it was alleged that the applicant was carrying a gun; that no grounds of arrest has been communicated to the applicant in writing during the time of his arrest
7. Per contra, learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application and would submit that the applicant has committed a very serious offence, hence, does not deserve to be enlarged on bail.
8. Having considered the submissions of
learned counsel for the parties and after going through the material available on record, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
9. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed.
10. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
( Alok Mah r a J.)
20.11.2025 Ujjwal