1 2025:CGHC:41231 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2430 of 2023 1 - Smt. Revati Sonwani W/o. Late Shri Dinesh Sonwani, Aged About 38 Years R/o. Ward No. 19, Ganjpara, Police Station Mahasamund, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3 - The Director, Directorate Urban Administration Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Joint Director, Urban Administration And Development Third Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Floor, Rda Building Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Pranay Golcha, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.S. Marhas, Advocate. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Adil Minhaj, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/08/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records relating to the matter of the petitioner for the kind perusal of this Honble Court 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to allow this writ petition and set-aside the impugned order dated 21.11.2022 and further may kindly be 3 please to direct the respondent authority to appoint the petitioner of compassionate. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstance of the cases including award of the cost of the petitioner may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat