APHC010200982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 10008/2025 Between: 1. MEKA VENKATA RAMIREDDY, S/O.PRAKASH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O.DO. 12-311, NTR COLONY TADEPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VADDESWARAM, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION TEAM, REP. BY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE S I T, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA , ANDHRA PRADESH. RESPONDENT NO.5 WAS SUOMOTO IMPLEADED AS PER C.O.DT.21.04.2025 IN W.P.NO.10008 OF 2025. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ, order direction directing the respondents to produce Sri T.Bala Subramanyam Red- or dy S/o. T.Kuppi Reddy, aged about 60 years before this Honble Court and for such consequential direction as deem fit and proper in the facts and circum stances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to constitute a judicial enquiry for the purpose of ascertaining the true facts of the case, in view of the harassment and undue hardship inflicted upon the detenue by the respondents through abuse of authority vested in them by law, and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file Reply Affidavit in the present writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MOHAMMED ABDUL BASITH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Sri Sai Manoj Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Mohammed Abdul Basith, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has given instruction to withdraw the present Writ Petition as he has already been set at liberty. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. _________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J. Date: 11.08.2025 BSM 4 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.10008 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Date: 11.08.2025 BSM