HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 879 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Ms. Ruby Mauray, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as Shri Abhai Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is the second anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No.196 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) IPC, registered at Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Bahraich. 3. The first anticipatory bail application No.440 of 2025 was dismissed by the following order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 23.04.2025: "1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of opposite party no.1. 2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.2 stand dispensed with. 3. First Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with regard to Case Crime no.196 of 2023 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for applicant seeks to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file regular bail. 5. Considering submissions advanced by learned counsel for applicant, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to applicant to file regular bail." 4. It appears that the applicant had earlier taken a chance of getting anticipatory bail from this Court and upon being unsuccessful, the applicant withdrew the anticipatory bail application seeking liberty to file a regular Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ruby Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Ranno Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) bail application, which liberty was granted to the applicant. However, thereafter the applicant has not appeared before the trial court for filing regular bail application and has again filed anticipatory bail application before this Court. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the second anticipatory bail application is not maintainable and the same is, accordingly, rejected. August 25, 2025 S. Shivhare ABAIL No. 879 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench