Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15661 (GAU)

ROKIBUL ALAMIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1591/2025 · 2025-09-21

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010150162025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1591/2025 ROKIBUL ALAMIN SON OF LATE SHAHIDUL ISLAM, R/O BOWALIARI, ABHAYAPUR, BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : M IMRAN HUSSAIN, R KHA,N. UDDIN,MS. P AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 22.09.2025 Heard Mr. M.I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Rokibul Alamin, has prayed for granting Page No.# 2/2 pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Abhayapuri P.S. Case no. 124/2025 under Section 329(4)/118(2)/109(1)/304(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 10.07.2025, the petitioner appeared before the investigating officer and recorded his statement – which is confirmed by the prosecution represented by Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. It is further submitted that in the mean time, the case has been charge sheeted. 4. In view of completion of investigation and cooperation rendered earlier by the petitioner, the interim protection vide dated 10.07.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions – that the petitioner shall be available for trial if one commences; and that the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 5. Violation or breach of condition(s) shall entail cancellation of the bail. 6. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. 7. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant