SUMIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/8892/2025 · 2025-08-12
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8892 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumit Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sriniwas Bajpai Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 and 2 and Mr. Sriniwas Bajpai, learned counsel for opposite parties no.3 and 4.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for release of payment of all admissible death-cum-retirement benefits of petitioner's mother, Late Smt Shanti, wife of Late Madan to the petitioner and other surviving legal heirs in their lawful shares.
3. Learned counsel for opposite parties no.3 and 4 on the basis of instructions submits that some payment could not be made earlier looking to the fact petitioner’s sister Smt. Geeta has raised objection to the petitioner's application for grant of such benefits.
4. Since consideration of petitioner’s grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Executive Officer Class-1, Nagar Palika Parishad, Sitapur which shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority after affording opportunity of
hearing to all the heirs of deceased.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench