Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15660 (HP)

MEENAKSHI KAUNDAL AND ORS v. ANIL KAUNDAL

Cr.Rev.(FC)/30/2024 · 2025-04-03

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2025:HHC:8919 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Criminal Revision (FC) 30 of 2024 Decided on: 03.04.2025 Smt. Meenakashi Kaundal and others ...…..Petitioners Versus Anil Kaundal …..Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioners: Mr. Piyush Verma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Shweta Joolka, Advocate. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) It is heartening to note that with the pro-active role played by the learned Mediator, Sh.S.C.Sharma, Senior Advocate, the parties have amicably settled their dispute. 2. The Criminal Revision is accordingly disposed of in terms of the compromise. The report of Mediator alongwith the statements of parties shall form part of the order. 3. It is made clear that since this order is being passed on the basis of the compromise, therefore, in that eventually, non- compliance and non-adherence of the terms of the compromise, the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes 2 aggrieved party, irrespective of its status, shall be free to approach this court to enforce the terms of the compromise. 4. Since mutual divorce is to be obtained, both the parties have agreed to file mutual divorce/ joint petition on or before 30th April, 2025, therefore, we deem it appropriate to list this case for compliance on 08.05.2025. Ordered accordingly. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 03rd April, 2025. (yogesh/gm)