924-CA-10317-2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10317 OF 2023 IN FAST/11877/2020 Jainfbee Pashamiya Sk ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Thr Dist. Collector, Nanded And Ors. …..Respondents ….. Mr. Tushar Nagarkar h/f Mr. Nagarkar Kiran M., Advocate for Applicant Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 09.04.2025 PER COURT : 1. This is an Application fled by the Original Claimant for condonation of 196 days delay caused in preferring the First Appeal. 2. None appears for Respondent No.3 though served. 3. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.G.P for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 4. The learned Advocate for the Applicant – Claimant submits that, suffcient reasons are shown in the Application for not preferring the Appeal within the prescribed time. Hence, the Application be allowed. 5. The Application is opposed by the learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 1 2025:BHC-AUG:10840 924-CA-10317-2023.odt 6. On going through the Application, it is clear that, suffcient reasons are made out in the Application for condonation of delay. Hence, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause - ‘B’. The Applicant / Appellant shall not be entitled for the statutory benefts and the interest for the aforesaid delayed period. Appeal be registered. The copy of this order be kept in the order sheet of the Appeal Memo. 7. Civil Application stands disposed off accordingly. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/April-2025 2 Signed by: Md. Sameer Q. Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/04/2025 14:38:56