APHC010201332013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9586/2013 Between: 1. SAREDDY KONDAMMA,, W/O LATE PEDA SIVA REDDY, AGED 38 YEARS. R/O KOTHAPALEM, THURUPU GANGAVARAM ROAD, DARISI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 2. SAREDDY CHINA SIVA REDDY,, S/O LATE RAINI REDDY. AGED 36 YEARS. R/O KOTHAPALEM, THURUPU GANGAVARAM ROAD, DARISI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 3. SAREDDY ESWARAMMA,, W/O LATE BUCHIREDDY. AGED 45 YEARS. R/O KOTHAPALEM, THURUPU GANGAVARAM ROAD, DARISI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 4. SAREDDY VENKATARAMI REDDY., S/O LATE KOTI REDDY, AGED 44 YEARS. R/O KOTHAPALEM, THURUPU GANGAVARAM ROAD, DARISI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 5. SAREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY,, S/O LATE KOTI REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O KOTHAPALEM, THURUPU GANGAVARAM ROAD, DARISI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, REP. BYH ITS REGIONAL MANAGER. VIJAYAWADA. MANGALAGIRI ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM 2 JS,J W.P.No.9586/2013 DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER ADDITIONAL DIST MAGISTRATE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR DARSI MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT, - 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ONGOLE PRAKASAM DISTRICT, - 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RB, KANIGIRI DIVISION, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. DEVATHI KARTHIK, S/O. VARA PRASAD. R/O DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. DIRECTOR OF TOWN COUNTRY PLANNING, MYTHRI VIHAR, 2ND FLOOR. AMEERPET, HYDERABAD. 10. THE JOINT COLLECTOR ONGOLE PRAKASAM DISTRICT, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly a one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 3rd respondent issued in D.Dis C5/516/2010, dt.21-04-2012 in issuing no objection certificate in favour of the 1st respondent for installation of HSD pumps and A&B underground tanks at new retail outlet in Sy.NO. 315/5 and 315/6 of Darsi Village and Mandal, Prakasam District basing on incorrect reports submitted by respondents 4 to 7 and ignoring the rejections of 9th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, against the public interest and consequently direct the respondents not to permit the 1st respondent to install FISD outlet in Sy.NO.315/5 and 315/6 of Darsi Village and Mandal, Prakasam District and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 11939 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 10th respondent not to issue any B-Form License in favour the 8th respondent for new retail outlet in Sy.NO.315/5 and 315/6 of Darsi Village and 3 JS,J W.P.No.9586/2013 Mandal, Prakasam District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 11940 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of the 3rd respondent issued in D.Dis C5/516/2010, dt. 21-04-2012 in issuing no objection certificate in favour of the 1st respondent for installation of HSD pumps and A&B underground tanks at new retail outlet in Sy.No.315/5 and 315/6 of Darsi Village and Mandal, Prakasam District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SITA RAM CHAPARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P V A PADMANABHAM 2. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO 3. G SUNDARA RAJAN 4. B MAYUR REDDY The Court made the following ORDER: Sri B. Dhanunjaya, learned counsel, representing Sri Sita Ram Chaparla, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 08.09.2025 KAS