Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156533 (MAD)

R.Velmurugan v. The District Collector/Monitoring Committee,

WP(MD)/22492/2025 · 2025-08-18

G Arul Murugan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.22492 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.(MD)No.22492 of 2025 R.Velmurugan ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The District Collector/Monitoring Committee, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sattur Taluk, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 4.R.Palanichamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1 to 3 respondents to remove the encroachment made by the fourth respondent in the Government Poramboku land situated at 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.22492 of 2025 S.No.40, Kanmaipatti Village, Papakudi Panchayat, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) The petitioner has instituted the present writ petition seeking for a direction to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made by the fourth respondent in the subject property. 2. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 produced a report of the Revenue Tahsildar, dated 18.08.2025, wherein, he stated that an inspection was conducted by the Revenue Authorities and in the inspection, it was found that the place where the petitioner complaints an encroachment is a private patta land belonging to the private respondents. This is also reported that there is no encroachment as alleged by the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.22492 of 2025 3. In view of the detailed report filed after inspection, finding that the subject properties are patta lands and there is no encroachment, the relief sought for in the writ petition cannot be granted. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S., J.) & (G.A.M., J.) 18.08.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No am To 1.The District Collector/Monitoring Committee, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sattur Taluk, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.22492 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. am W.P.(MD)No.22492 of 2025 18.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis