Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15653 (AP)

G SUNDARN KUMAR v. S SURESH KUMAR IAS

CC/1081/2025 · 2025-07-09

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010201632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1081/2025 Between: 1. G SUNDARN KUMAR, S/O. G. VENKATA SURYANARAYANA MURTHY AGED 54 YEARS R/O. D. NO.21-7-14, MADEENA STREET SALIPETA, KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, THE MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. DR P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI BHAWNA IAS, THE COMMISSIONER KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. P KAMESWARAO, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 6. S MACHHI RAJU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take to cognizance the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to punish them for violating the orders dated 6.05.2024 passed in W.P No. 5024 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following: ORDER Sri A. Nagendra Vicky, learned counsel, representing Smt. Marella Radha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has been complied with and this Contempt Case may be closed. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR