COCP-4000 IN THE HI 101 Keshav Kum Vinay Kuma CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Division Ben vs. Haryana directed as u 2. petitioner t 4000-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o v Kumar Versus Kumar and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 07.04.2025 (An on Bench of this Court in LPA-1871 aryana Staff Selection Commission d as under:- “10. We accordingly modify passed by the learned Single J No. 7/appellant herein, to be appointment, and as he has se own category, the Haryana Sta now take into consideration his and make recommendations to consideration for appointment. being made, the concerned emp appropriate orders within a p found otherwise suitable. 11. It is made clear that the shall be given notionally from in merit have been so appointed paid to him for the intervening p At the very outset, it is affirme ner that in compliance of the ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4000-2025 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA te for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the 1871-2023, titled as ‘Keshav Kumar ssion and others’ whereby it was dify the order dated 31.10.2023 gle Judge and hold the petitioner be eligible for consideration for s secured sufficient marks in his Staff Selection Commission shall n his merit treating him as eligible s to respondent No. 2/HAFED for ent. Upon such recommendation employer shall proceed and pass a period of one month, if he is t the appointment of the appellant rom the date other persons lesser inted. However, no salary shall be ing period.” affirmed by learned counsel for the f the order dated 07.04.2025 ging the was 23 er for is all le or on ss is nt er the 025 RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-4000 (Annexure appointment 3. that the nam 4. 5. required to b of, according 6. 7. 05.05.2026 rishu 4000-2025 -2- xure P-1), name of the petitioner tment. Learned counsel for the State e name of the petitioner has been recom Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ioner has been recommended for State on instructions also submits n recommended. above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No for mits are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.