Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156494 (ALL)

RAM SURESH v. CHAIRMAN U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. UPPCL LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/7591/2025 · 2025-08-13

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47361-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7591 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Suresh Respondent :- Chairman U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Uppcl Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra P. Singh,Mohd. Sheraj,Shashank Vikram Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Neerav Chitravanshi,Manish Jauhari Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Shruti Sahu, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Manish Jauhari, learned counsel for the Power Corporation. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with following main prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, Order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing the demand notice dated 08.02.2020 & 06.07.2021 passed by the opp. party no.3. (As contained as annexure no. 2 & 3). 2. To Issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS Commanding Opp. Party no. 2 & 3 not to take any legal action in pursuance of the above arbitrary or illegal demand notice against the petitioner." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has received a notice for disconnection of electricity line on the ground that he has not paid electricity dues amounting to Rs.33,989/-. Such notice was issued on 8.2.2020. Later on, another notice has been issued and this time, the dues have been shown as Rs.49,260. It is the case of the petitioner that he lives in a village and the petitioner's house was constructed by his father and no electricity connection was ever applied for or given to the father of the petitioner or to the petitioner, yet the electricity bills have been generated and the aforesaid amounts are showing due against the petitioner. The petitioner represented to the Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Khand, Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar. A copy of such representation has been filed as Annexure-5 to the writ petition. 4. Without entering into the controversy involved in the present case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Khand, Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar, to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him. 5. Till decision on the representation of the petitioner, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned notices. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench