COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. PENGUIN APPARELS PVT LTD
TCA/456/2009 · 2025-07-11
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15649 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15649 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
TCA No.456 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA No.456 of 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Madurai Appellant Vs Penguin Apparels (P) Ltd, 82, Aruppukottai Road, Madurai-625 012. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai, dated 8.12.2008 in ITA No.7/Mds/2008. For Appellant: Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Sr. Standing Counsel For Respondent: Mr.A.S.Sriraman __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA No.456 of 2009
JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The appeal was admitted on 30.6.2009 on the following questions of law:
“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the deduction under Section 80HHC is to be allowed without deducting the deduction granted under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in ignoring the specific provision 80IA(9) read with Section 80IB(13) which forbids deduction to the extent of profit allowed under Section 80IB under any provision of Chapter VIA?”
2. Mr.Narayanaswamy states that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India. Counsel says that he has instructions, therefore, to withdraw the appeal.
3. Moreover, both the questions of law will be covered by a decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU v. Rane Brake Lining __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA No.456 of 2009 Ltd1. Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.)
11.07.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi To:
1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I Madurai.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle I, Madurai. 1 2025 SCC OnLine Mad 2680 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA No.456 of 2009 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SUNDER MOHAN,J. (sasi)
TCA No.456 of 2009
11.07.2025 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis