Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010308892019 2025:GAU-AS:2539 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/2519/2018 ABDUL GAFUR S/O- LATE MAHAMMAD ALI R/O- VILL.- HAIDOBI MOUZA- BATADARBA DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM VERSUS AFIA KHATUN AND 7 ORS. W/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM 2:AZIZUL HAQUE S/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM 3:AZHARAUDDIN S/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM 4:ALIZA KHATUN D/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM 5:ON THE DEATH OF ABU TAHER HIS LEGAL HEIRS R/O- VILL- HAIDOBI P.O.- KADAMONI MOUZA- BATADARBA DIST.- NAGAON PIN- 782122 5.1:HASANARA BEGUM W/O- ABU TAHER 5.2:MISS ANJUMA KHATUN D/O- ABU TAHER Page No.# 2/4 5.3:MISS SULTANA KHATUN D/O- ABU TAHER 5.4:MISS SABIQUN KHATUN D/O- ABU TAHER 5.5:MD. SHAHIDUL HOQUE S/O- ABU TAHER 5.6:MD. AKRAM HUSSAIN S/O- ABU TAHER ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL.- HAIDOBI P.O.- KADAMONI MOUZA- BATADARBA DIST.- NAGAON PIN- 782122 6:MARIUM NESSA D/O- LATE ABDUL MOZID R/O- VILL.- HAIDOBI P.O.- KADAMONI MOUZA- BATADARBA DIST.- NAGAON PIN- 782122 7:MALIKA KAHTUN D/O- LATE ABDUL MOZID R/O- VILL.- HAIDOBI P.O.- KADAMONI MOUZA- BATADARBA DIST.- NAGAON PIN- 782122 8:JOSNARA BEGUM D/O- LATE ABDUL MOZID R/O- VILL.- HAIDOBI P.O.- KADAMONI MOUZA- BATADARBA DIST.- NAGAON PIN- 782122 ------------ Advocate for : MR. R GOSWAMI Advocate for : MR. R J BORDOLOI appearing for AFIA KHATUN AND 7 ORS. Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 10.03.2025 1. Learned counsel Mr. R.Goswami is present for the applicant and learned counsel Mr. M.Boro is present for the respondent/opposite party Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant praying for setting aside the abatement in the connected C.R.P. (I/O) 56/2018. 3. The Respondent No. 5, Abu Taher, has expired on 13/05/2016. The legal heirs of Abu Taher are his wife Hasanara Begum, 3 daughters, viz., Miss Anjuma Khatun, Miss Sultana Khatun, and Miss Sabiqun Khatun and 2 Sons viz., Md. Shahidul Hoque, and Md. Akram Hussain. Now they are all necessary parties in the connecgted revision petition and therefore applicant has already filed a substitution petition to bring the names of the surviving legal representatives of late Abu Taher in the connected revision petition as opposite parties. 4. The applicant has filed another application, under Section 5 of the limitation Act, 1963, for condoning the delay of 563 days for filing the substitution petition explaining the reason for the delay which prevented the applicant to file substitution petition in time. 5. The applicant begs to state that the applicant could not file the substitution petition within the period as provided under the law and therefore if any order of abatement is passed then the said order of abatement may kindly be set aside. 6. The learned counsel for the opposite party has no objection against the setting aside the abatement. Page No.# 4/4 7. Considering the submissions, the abatement so far as the deceased respondent No. 5 is concerned is set aside. 8. In terms of the above observations, the interlocutory application stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant