HARISH CHANDRA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
/8809/2025 · 2025-08-06
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156482 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156482 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45640 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8809 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Secondary Education Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deo Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 6. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 7 taking into
consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired long time back while working on the post of Assistant Teacher yet his retiral dues have still not been paid.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.6 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 6 has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.6 then the respondent No.6 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench