SANJAY KUMAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/8817/2025 · 2025-08-06
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156464 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156464 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45778 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8817 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Srivastav,Syed Tabrez Haider Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Pandey Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Ramesh Chandra Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no . 2 and 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. The petitioner, a class-IV employee, is before this Court claiming promotion on the ground that he is perfectly eligible for being promoted on a Class-III Post. On the other hand, Sri Ramesh Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 & 3 states that promotion is to be made on the basis of seniority and as and when the petitioner comes within the eligibility, his claim would be considered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Ramesh Chandra Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no . 2 and 3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench