Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48047 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7631 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajnath @ Pappu Sharma And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,S.K. Singhaniya Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Sri S.K. Singhaniya, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5, same is taken on record. 2. By means of present writ petition the petitioners have challenged order dated 28.07.2025, passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya in Suit No. 277 of 2025, wherein he has rejected the application for interim relief preferred by the petitioners and has issued notices to the private respondents therein. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that dispute in the present case relates to the property of one Raj Dei W/o Gherrau, situated at Village - Ballikripalpur and Kichhuti Kishundaspur, Pargana - Paschim Rath, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya. It is next submitted that after death of original tenure holder, the petitioners father has applied for mutation on the basis of succession, while respondent nos. 4 and 5 had contested the case on the basis of registered will deed before Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya. The application of petitioners was allowed on 19.08.2019 and names of petitioner were recorded in the revenue records. Against order dated 19.08.2019, respondent nos. 4 and 5 filed an appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), which was allowed on 18.01.2025. Against order dated 18.01.2025, the petitioners filed revision under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya. 4. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer only for suitable direction to respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Revision No. 277 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202504000000277) - Rajnath @ Pappu Sharma and Others Vs. Manju Devi and Others, expeditiously. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the limited innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the private respondents submits that they have already put in appearance and filed objections to the revision petition and now the matter has to be heard on merits after summoning the trial Court's record. 7. In the light of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Revision No. 277 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202504000000277) - Rajnath @ Pappu Sharma and Others Vs. Manju Devi and Others, expeditiously, say within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. 8. The parties undertake to cooperate in the proceedings before respondent no. 2. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench