Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15644 (JHR)

PHULWA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4554/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14675 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4554 of 2025 ---- Phulwa Devi, aged about 28 years, wife of Late Bablu Turi, Resident of Village- Singhpur, P.O.+P.S.- Ahilyapur, District – Giridih. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Roy, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 05th June, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner who is in custody since 29.04.2024 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.461 of 2024 (M.C.A. No.661 of 2025) arising out of Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.18 of 2024, registered for the offences under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code but the charge has been framed against him under Section 304 of the IPC. Now the case is pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih or his successor Court. 3. It has been submitted that there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence and she has falsely been implicated in this case. Further, undertaking has been given by her for participation in the trial and she is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this Court. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih or his successor Court in connection with S.T. No.461 of 2024 (M.C.A. No.661 of 2025) arising out of Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.18 of 2024. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and she shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amar/- Uploaded