238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6834-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.04.2025 Maya Devi and Others ….Petitioners Versus Ram Niwas ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate for the petitioners. **** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the demised premises has already been vacated as a result of which, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 24.04.2025 Prince Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No. PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.04.24 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document