IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13459 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Sharda Chandal Contract Private Limited Through Dhruva Narayan Singh and Ors S/o Late Brij Nandan Singh, of Village- Sitabdir Post P.S.- Dhanha, District- West Champaran. 2. Mata Vaishno and Chandel Construction Pvt. Ltd. through Mohan Singh, S/o Late Brij Narayan Singh, of Village- Sitabdiyar Post P.S.- Dhanha, District- West Champaran. 3. Raut Contract Pvt. Ltd. through Satendra Raut, S/o Harakh Raut, Village- Semarwari, P.O.- Dhanha, P.S.- Thakraha O.P.- Bhitaha, District- West Champaran. 4. Mahanta Signh, S/o Late Jamedar Singh, of Village- Harpur Mujauna, P.O. and P.S.- Thakraha, District- West Champaran. 5. Mahendra Prasad Gupta, S/o Late Raj Narayan Sah of Village- Madhuha, P.O.- Ranglalhi, P.S.- Dhanha, District- West Champaran. 6. Ranjit Singh, S/o Late Nanku Singh, ov Village- Gauri Tola, P.O. and P.s. Dhanha, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Water Resources Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department Flood Control, Gopalganj, P.S. and District- Gopalga 5. The Superintending Engineer, Flood Control Circle- Padrauna, West Champaran. 6. The Executive Engineer Flood Control Division-I, Madhubani, Camp Pandrauna, West Champaran. 7. The Executive Engineer, Flood Control Division-II, Pandrauna, West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Anjani Kumar-AAG4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 3 30-06-2025 1. This Court has passed a detailed order dated 15.05.2025, which reads as follows:- Patna High Court CWJC No.13459 of 2017(3) dt.30-06-2025 2/2 1. Pleading are complete. 2. The Learned counsel for the petitioners sought for an adjournment. 3. The Learned counsel for the respondents contended that the Writ petition has become infructuous as the payment has been made to the petitioner. 4. Although, for giving a fair opportunity to the Learned counsel for the petitioner, list on 30.06.2025, as a last indulgence. 2. In spite of the said order, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non- prosecution. Amandeep/- (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) U