Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 8779 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sham Lal
…….Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
_______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 4.5.2025 enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 4.6.2025, which are taken on record, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General states that impugned transfer order has been cancelled and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings.
2.
Having perused aforesaid communication as well as office order dated 4.6.2025, this Court finds merit in the aforesaid submission of learned Additional Advocate General and as such,
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge June 05, 2025 (shankar)