BHRIGUNATH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. OF VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/811/2025 · 2025-08-07
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46049-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 811 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhrigunath Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Of Village Development Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. The petition should implead the Tehsildar, Tehsil Bheeti, District Ambedkar Nagar, as an opposite party during course of the day and correct the copy provided to the learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for Gaon Sabha.
2. The Khadanja on the chak marg is to be constructed by the Gaon Sabha, however, the learned counsel for the State says that there is encroachment on the chak marg, for which the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P Revenue Code have been initiated and are pending, so does Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
3. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Tehsildar to conclude the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P Revenue Code, as per law, expeditiously, say within two months. Thereafter, the request of the petitioners and other villagers shall be considered by the Gaon Sabha, if there is no other legal impediment. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 7.8.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench