Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156418 (ALL)

RAMA VATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAGISTRATE DIST. SHRAWASTI AND 4 OTHERS

/7601/2025 · 2025-08-13

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47345-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7601 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rama Vati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Dist. Shrawasti And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with following main prayers:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. Parties concerned to take the necessary action regarding the grievances of the petitioner raised in the application dated 16.06.2025 as contained in Annexure No 1 to this writ petition and protect the land of petitioner mentioned in the application and also protect the life and personal liberty as well as harassment and torture of the petitioner from the land grabbers and Bhumafias i.e. opp. party no. 5 and his associates and also take the necessary action against them in accordance with law in the interest of the justice. ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. Parties concerned to consider and decide the application dated 16.06.2025 of petitioner as contained in Annexure no. 1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice." 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed, the issuance of notice to respondent no.5 is dispensed with. 4. We have gone through the representation made by the petitioner to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ikauna, Shrawasti, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Evidently, the petitioner is raising a private dispute and we do not wish to give any jurisdiction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate to interfere in a private dispute where the appropriate remedy would be to approach the Court of Law. 5. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench