AYAZ ALI AND ANOTHER v. ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE,COURT NO. 6 ,UNNAO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6733/2022 · 2025-04-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18951 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6733 of 2022 Petitioner :- Ayaz Ali And Another Respondent :- Addl. District Judge,Court No. 6 ,Unnao And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Farooq ahmad Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the impugned orders, whereby an application for release of the premises was rejected under the U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972.
3. Considering the fact that the U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 has been repealed and new Rent Act 2021 is enforced.
4. In view of the above, I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned orders. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an appropriate application afresh under the new Rent Act, 2021, if so advised, in accordance with law. In case any application is filed under the new Act, the same shall be decided on its merits without being influenced by the two orders impugned herein. Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench