Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156390 (ALL)

MO. NAFIS AND ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. HOME LKO AND ORS.

CRLP/6283/2024 · 2025-05-02

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25466-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6283 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mo. Nafis And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lko And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Charan Singh,Rahul Kannojia,Rajesh Kumar Pal,Vivek Raghubanshi Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 23.8.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0710 of 2024, under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) of B.N.S., 2023, and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Fatehpur, District Barabanki. 3. On 22.4.2025, parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar for verification of compromise. 4. The report of the Senior Registrar of this Court dated 25.4.2025 is on record, according to which, he has verified the compromise on 25.4.2025. The original compromise is on record as Annexure-SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit. 5. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have decided to withdraw all the cases filed by them against each other including First Information Report dated 23.8.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0710 of 2024, under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) of B.N.S., 2023, and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Fatehpur, District Barabanki. 6. Learned counsel for the parties state that the dispute under the said compromise is already settled between the parties. 7. Intent is clear, the informant-Smt. Naziya Khatoon, who is a signatory to the compromise, does not want to press the FIR, therefore, no purpose would be served in allowing the proceedings even if charge sheet has been filed before the court below to go on considering the nature of the dispute. 8. Accordingly, the impugned FIR, which is the basis to serve consequential proceedings of investigation and thereafter filing of charge sheet, if any, is hereby quashed. Consequently, all proceedings taken consequent to the lodging of the FIR including charge sheet, if any, filed before the court below stand quashed. 9. The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed. 10. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this order to the court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly. 11. Learned AGA shall communicate this order to the investigating officer. . [Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench