Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15639 (KAR)

RAVI KUMAR. V. R. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1567/2025 · 2025-07-02

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23678 CRL.P No. 1567 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1567 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: RAVI KUMAR. V. R. S/O LATE REDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO. 100, VAGATA VILLAGE AND POST, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL – 562 114 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY M. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THIRUMALASHETTAHALLI P.S HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DIST. – 562 114 REP. BY ITS SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. V. M. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O MUNIARASAPPA R/AT NO. 9, 82/A, 2ND B MAIN, 2ND CROSS, MARENAHALL, J.P NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE – 560 078 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SHASHIKUMAR R., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 (FILED U/S.528 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ADJUDICATION IN CRIME NO.231/2024 FOR OFFENCE U/S.316(2), Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23678 CRL.P No. 1567 of 2025 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 61(2) OF BNS 2023 AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN PENDING AJUDICATION BEFORE THE IInd ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSAKOTE AT BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT UNDERTAKEN BY THE THIRUMALASHETTAHALLI POLICE STATION AT ANNEXURE A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since charge sheet was filed on 28.01.2025 even before the present petition was preferred, the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file fresh petition challenging the charge sheet, in accordance with law. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25