Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156383 (ALL)

BABU LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO AND OTHERS

A227/4785/2025 · 2025-08-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46741 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4785 of 2025 Petitioner :- Babu Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Phal,Divya Singh,Neelam Kumari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Banwari Lal Maurya Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 to 3 and Shri Satish Chandra "Kashish" Advocate, who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.4. 2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial) First, Lucknow to decide the interim relief /stay application dated 15.07.2025, pending before the respondent no.2 in Appeal No.C3757/2023 (Computer Case No.C202310000003757), under Section 38(4) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Babulal vs. Gangadei and another, expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial) First, Lucknow considers and decides the aforesaid interim relief application in the time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial) First, Lucknow is directed to decide the application for interim relief filed in Appeal No.C3757/2023 (Computer Case No.C202310000003757), under Section 38(4) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Babulal vs. Gangadei and another, say within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 11.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench