::1:: APHC010199682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10153/2025 Between: Palepu Thirupathi Naidu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NUVVULA RAM BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE ::2:: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10153/2025 This Court made the following ORDER: The Instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner for the following relief: “..to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of respondents more particularly on the part of the 4th respondent in considering mee seva portal application dated 02.11.2024 vide No.MUT241102051694 submitted by the petitioner through online for mutation of his name in the revenue records and for issuance of Pattadar pass book and title deed to petitioner in respect of pettioner’s agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0.86 cents or 0.348 hectares in Sy.No.118- 2C3 situated at Juvvigunta Village & Gramapanchayat, Juvvigunta Village No.380, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District in accordance with provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 and Rules framed thereunder as illegal, irregular, highhanded, mala fide, unjust and arbitrary, without any reason or ground and violation of the principles of natural justice and violation of the provisions of the A.P. Rights in land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 and Rules framed thereunder and violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to mutate the petitioner’s name in the revenue records and to issue Pattadar Passbook and Title deed to the petitioner in respect of the aforesaid property and to pass..” 2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner ::3:: requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the online mee- seva application dated 02.11.2024 vide No. MUT241102051694 of the Petitioner. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the online mee-seva application dated 02.11.2024 of the petitioner, if any pending with the authorities. 4. In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do no service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the online mee-seva application dated 02.11.2024, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 ::4:: 5. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to dispose of the online mee-seva application dated 02.11.2024 vide No. MUT241102051694 of the Petitioner within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA,J Dt: 22.04.2025 krk ::5:: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 117 WRIT PETITION NO: 10153/2025 22.04.2025 krk