VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIB/756/2025 · 2025-08-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46889 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 756 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- I.M. Pandey Ist,Ajeet Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 -Consolidation Officer, Milkipur, District Ayodhya to decide case No.715/2025- Vinod Kumar and others Vs. Sirtazi, under Section 9 A (2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Consolidation Officer, Milkipur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide case No.715/2025- Vinod Kumar and others Vs. Sirtazi, under Section 9 A (2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 11.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench