APHC010200372020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13053/2020 Between: 1. CHAGANTI MALLAIAH, FATHER NAME. CH. SUNKAPPA, AGE. 45, R/O. D.NO.18-1029, TILAK NAGAR, GUNTAKALLU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU RANGE ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANANTAPURAMU. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANANTAPURAMU. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTAKALLU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, URAVAKONDA POLICE STATION, URAVAKONDA, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAJRAKARUR POLICE STATION, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 7. CHAGANTI NALLAMMA, R/O KOKANDALA VILLAGE, VAJRAKARUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2 8. CHAGANTI MURALIMOHAN, R/O KOKANDALA VILLAGE, VAJRAKARUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13053 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th to 6th respondent in not receiving the complaint dated 30.06.2020 and registering FIR against respondents 7 and 8 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 7 and 8 to receive the complaint dated 30.06.2020 and registered FIR against respondents 7 and 8 and pass….” 2. Heard Sri P.Aditya Harsha Vardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that on receipt of complaint of the petitioner through registered post, the respondent police called the petitioner and the unofficial respondents for preliminary enquiry, but the petitioner did not turn up for the preliminary enquiry. After due enquiry, it came to light that the subject matter is purely civil in nature. He would further submit that they are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedies before appropriate forum. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13053 of 2020 Dated.11.09.2025 UPS 161