2025:HHC:17743 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9300 of 2025 Decided on: 05.06.2025 Sanjeev Bhatnagar … Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation, Shimla and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Mukul Sood, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 an 2. 2. Taking into consideration the issue raised in this petition, without making any observation on the merit of the case, as prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that let the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Shimla, take appropriate action on the complaint filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today, in accordance with law, by adhering to the principles of natural justice. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:17743 merit of the case and due opportunity shall be given to all stakeholders and their respective contentions shall be taken into consideration before passing the order. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 05, 2025 (narender)