Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15634 (CHH)

VASHISHTHA SHARMA (VISHWAKARMA) v. SMT. SUSHILA SHARMA

WP227/321/2019 · 2025-07-02

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:30259 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 321 of 2019 Vashishtha Sharma (Vishwakarma) S/o Ramanand Vishwakarma, Aged About 53 Years R/o In Front Of Seema Fancy Stores, Badhaipara, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Smt. Sushila Sharma W/o Ramsagar Sharma Aged About 61 Years R/o Near Water Tank, Behind Friend Pan Palace, Bajrang Nagar, Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 1 / Plaintiff ), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Munnalal Vishwakarma S/o Ramanand Vilshwakarma Aged About 62 Years R/o In Front Of Seema Fancy Stores, Badhaipara, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 2 / Defendant No. 1 ), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Usha Sharma W/o Subhash Sharma Aged About 35 Years R/o Near Water Tank, Behind Friend Pan Palace, Bajrang Nagar Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 3 / Defendant No. 3 ) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Anushka Sharma, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 03.07.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim