SURAJ SRIVASTAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SOCIAL WELFARE LKO. U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
/8771/2025 · 2025-08-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156328 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156328 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45263 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8771 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suraj Srivastav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare Lko. U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Upadhyay,Diksha Tiwari,Sanjana Upadhyay,Saurabh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to
4. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 5 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner's father namely Sri Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Srivastava who was working as a Peon in the respondent no. 5- Institution and died on 27.02.2023 during his service, his death cum retiral dues have still not been paid. It is contended that the respondent no. 5- Institution vide letter dated 02.08.2024, a copy of which is annexure 9 to the writ petition had required the petitioner and other legal heirs to submit requisite documents which have also been submitted but till date, the dues have still not been paid.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.4 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 4 has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.4 then the respondent No.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench