Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1563 (UTT)

KAVITA AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/50/2025 · 2025-01-30

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:643 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/50/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. D.P. Mittal, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Shubhr Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Dy. A.G. with Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. By the instant petition, the petitioners are praying that they may be provided adequate security to their life and liberty since there is a threat perception from respondent nos. 3 to 8. 4. It is submitted that both the petitioners are major and they married with each other on 13.01.2025 as per the Hindu rites and their marriage is also registered on the same day copy of which is also annexed as annexure-2. The petitioner approached the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar, by way of representation for protection of their life (Annexure-3 to the petition) but in vain. Hence, they approach this Court for protection of their life 5. In that view of the matter, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar is directed to take decision for providing police protection to the petitioners in view of the threat perception to the petitioners within three weeks. 6. Till the decision is taken on the representation, the concerned SHO shall provide adequate protection to the petitioners. 7. Subject to the directions as above, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) (Vacation Judge) 30.01.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:643