Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15626 (UTT)

DALJEET SINGH ALIAS RUBAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1440/2025 · 2025-11-17

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10144 WPCRL No.1440 of 2025 Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J. Ms. Sarita Bisht, learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand/1 and 2. 3. The present Petitioner has put a challenge to the FIR No.0158 of 2024, dated 26.08.2024 which was registered at Police Station Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar for his alleged involvement in commission of the offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of IPC. 4. As far as the offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of IPC are concerned, it carry a sentence of less than seven years, and it will be covered by the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matters of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State Of Bihar” reported in 2014 (8) SCC 273, where the applicant is required to surrender before the court and seek his bail. However, the said benefit of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar”, would be extended to the petitioner, subject to the condition that he cooperates with the investigation and render full support to the respondent no.2. 5. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is being disposed of under the guidelines framed under the judgment of “Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar”. However, if there is any dereliction on part of the petitioner for not cooperating in the investigation, the benefit as granted by this order would automatically seize to have its effect. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 1 7 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Nitesh/