- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:38502 WP No. 19644 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.19644 OF 2018 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. H.N. NAGARAJU @ HAA MUU NAGARAJU S/O LATE SRI MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT HARAGADDE VILLAGE JIGNI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARGAV G, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BENGALURU NAGARA ZILLA PANCHAYAT S. KARIYAPPA ROAD BANASHANKARI BENGALURU-560070 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR TOWN AND RURAL PLANNING AUTHORITY KITHAGANAHALLI GATE CHANDAPURA CIRCLE ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106. 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106. Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2023:KHC:38502 WP No. 19644 of 2018 4. PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER HARAGADDE GRAM PANCHAYAT HARAGADDE VILLAGE JIGNI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. M.S. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO FORM THE ROAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VILLAGE MAP VIDE ANNX-D. RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM ENCROACHING UPON THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER BEARING SY.NO.14/4 OF HARADAGGE VILLAGE, JIGNI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, IN THE COURSE OF FORMATION OF ROAD, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO RESTAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM ENCROACHING UPON THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER BEARING SY.NO.14/4 OF HARADAGGE VILLAGE, JIGNI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, IN THE COURSE OF FORMATION OF ROAD, PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Despite the order dated 27.09.2023, none appears for the petitioner today also. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63