1 2025:CGHC:14206 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1815 of 2022 1 - Smt. Neelima Xalxo W/o Shri Sanjay Ekka Aged About 37 Years Village Kansabel, Tahsil Bagicha, Police Station Kansabel, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Chief Engineer Department Of P.W.D. National Highways Division, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Land Acquisition Officer Cum Sub Divisonal Officer (Revenue) Bagicha, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Executive Engineer N.H. Division Cum Nhdp - Piu, P.W.D. At / P.O. Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kishore Mehta and Mr. Anand Kujur, Advocates RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.03.26 19:42:54 +0530 2 For State/Respondent(s) : Mrs. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Government Advocate For Respondents No. 4 & 6 : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/03/2025 1. Heard Mr. Jitendra Kishore Mehta and Mr. Anand Kujur, learned counsels for the petitioner as well as Mrs. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Government Advocate for the State/respondent/s. Also heard, Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI for the respondents No. 4 & 6 2. At the very outset, learned State counsel would submit that since, the petitioner has challenged construction of Toll Plaza, it seems that the matter would be Public Interest Litigation, as such, the petitioner is having alternative remedy in the eye of law, to which the learned counsel for the petitioner has not objected. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to file appropriate application before the appropriate Bench, where the petitioner’s grievances can be redressed. 4. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi