Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15623 (UTT)

LEELA SHARMA v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

WPMS/3572/2025 · 2025-12-23

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11547 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS/ 3 5 7 2 / 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate with Ms. Sukhwani Singh and Ms. Sazia Parveen, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. Respondent No. 2 was elected as Pradhan of Gram Sabha in District Dehradun. According to the petitioner, she is disqualified to hold the office of Pradhan because respondent No. 2 has encroached upon government land. 3. The complaint made by petitioner is on record as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. 4. Petitioner submits that despite complaint having made in the month of August, 2025, no decision is taken. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority to take decision on the complaint made by petitioner, as per law, within four months from date of presentation of certified copy of this order. 6. It goes without saying that respondent No. 2 and other stakeholders, if any, shall also be given reasonable opportunity of hearing before passing any order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.12.2025 Mahinder 2025:UHC:11547