SHIVRAJ SINGH S/O KALYAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5160/2025 · 2025-05-21
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15620 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15620 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21403] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5160/2025
1. Shivraj Singh S/o Kalyan Singh, R/o Beekaran (Kalyanpura), Police Station Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Bundi).
2. Shahrookh Khan S/o Jakir Husain, R/o Muslim Mohalla Dabi, Police Station Dabi, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Bundi).
3. Mukesh S/o Keluram @ Kelia, R/o Kanwarpura, Police Station Dabi, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Bundi).
4. Hemendra Kumar S/o Nandkishor, R/o Rawle Ke Pass, Bijoliya Kalan, Police Station Bijoliya, District Bhilwara (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 21/05/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.62/2025 registered at Police Station-Dabi, District-Bundi for the offences under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 and 21 of MMRD Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel
[2025:RJ-JP:21403] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5160/2025] further submits that the allegation against them is of illegal mining. In the FIR itself, complainant has mentioned that as per the relevant Act the penalty comes to Rs.46,34,000/-, which has been deposited by the petitioners in the concerned department. In support of his contentions, he has submitted the receipts of such deposits. There are no criminal case registered against them. Petitioners are behind the bars since 02.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Shivraj Singh S/o Kalyan Singh, Shahrookh Khan S/o Jakir Husain, Mukesh S/o Keluram @ Kelia and Hemendra Kumar S/o Nandkishor shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/31