Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156196 (ALL)

SMT. GAYATRI DEVI v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, AASPUR DEVSARA, TEHSIL PATTI, PRATAPGARH AND ANOTHER

/4695/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45541 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4695 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Gayatri Devi Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar, Aaspur Devsara, Tehsil Patti, Pratapgarh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Aaspur Devsara, Tehsil - Patti, District - Pratapgarh, for expeditious disposal of mutation Case No. 1601 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202502570401601) - Gayatri Devi Vs. Vinay Kumar, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Aaspur Devsara, Tehsil - Patti, District - Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court/Authority concerned and move an appropriate application, detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of mutation Case No. 1601 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202502570401601) - Gayatri Devi Vs. Vinay Kumar, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench